Line two · traditional training and AI courses

The requirement is never that people attended. It is that the record survives.

Somebody has told you your staff must be trained: a client, a tender, a licence condition, or a board that wants AI used properly instead of talked about. What gets checked afterwards is not how good the session felt. It is whether the right people were in the room, for the right courses, with records in the format the checker asks for.

The two halves, and they are not the same job

Half one

Traditional training: the requirement that is being checked

Short courses, supervisory and safety training, and the licence-linked training a security agency has to run twice a year. The work is in the design and the records as much as the teaching: the right titles, the right people on the right dates, attendance kept the way the assessor wants it, and a syllabus that answers the criterion sentence by sentence.

What it changes for you: the file is right the first time, so nobody has to re-run a course because the records were in the wrong shape.

Half two

AI courses: the three tasks that actually change

Most AI training teaches people what AI is, and nothing in their Monday changes. We work the other way round: pick the three tasks in a person's week that are slow, repetitive or being done twice, do them together in the tool they already have, and only then explain the idea behind it.

What it changes for you: people leave with something they have already done once, not notes they will never reopen.

How the engagement runs

1. What is being asked for, and by whom

The sentence in the contract, the criterion, or the licence condition, read in its own words. If your requirement is the security-agency C.2 cycle, it is covered on the SACE page and it is stricter than most people expect.

2. The syllabus is built against that sentence

Every component of the requirement gets a session that answers it, and the wording is the criterion's own — not our summary of it. You see the syllabus before anyone is booked.

3. Delivery, then the records

We run the sessions and we keep the attendance records, the dates and the results in the file at the same time, not reconstructed afterwards. You get the file, in your name, at the end.

4. If you would rather run it yourself

Your own people can be trained to deliver it and to keep the records correctly. That is a smaller job than paying for delivery twice a year, and for an agency with steady headcount it is usually right.

What it costs, and the honest limits

The fee depends on headcount, so it is quoted, not listed

Group size, how many courses, whether it is on your site or ours, and how much of the record-keeping you want us to carry. You get one written figure before the first session, and no per-head surprise afterwards.

We are not a training provider with a catalogue

If a public course already exists that fits, we will say so and you should buy that instead. We build the course when the requirement is specific to your company or to a client's contract.

Training does not substitute for the work

A course cannot make a system compliant on its own, and we will not sell training as though it can. Where the requirement is really about records or a system, we say that at the start.

Two ways to start, neither of them a sales call

Build a course your own staff delivers, or send one person on the AI course and see whether the tasks change. Ask us first if you are not sure which.

Build a course The AI course Ask a question first

The grant note

Every scheme, and what changed since the last note.

One email a week at most: what the government is offering an SME this month, which schemes have closed, and the one thing to check before you spend — in the order that keeps the claim valid. No pitch, and nothing about our own fees.

Your address is kept for this note only. We record the date, and the exact words you agreed to.